Opportunity Assessment
We look at how your teams work today and where the same effort repeats. Each candidate is written up with the value it would release, the risk it carries, and what it would take to build, then ranked against the others.
Services
We work with your leadership and your practitioners to find where AI earns its keep, what it would cost to get there, and in what order to do it. The output is a decision you can defend, not a pilot that goes nowhere.
Get Started
What advisory covers
Most AEC companies we meet have already tried something. A chatbot nobody uses, a tool a supplier demonstrated, a pilot that never left one department. What is missing is a view of the whole business: where the money and the hours actually go, which of those problems AI can move, and what the first working system has to look like. That is what we are there to produce.
We look at how your teams work today and where the same effort repeats. Each candidate is written up with the value it would release, the risk it carries, and what it would take to build, then ranked against the others.
What to buy off the shelf, what to build, and what to leave alone. We take a position on models, hosting, data access and integration, so the first project does not lock you out of the second one.
The EU AI Act, GDPR, and the client agreements that govern your project data. We establish what applies to your use cases and what has to be in place before a system touches real work.
* Scope and duration depend on the size of the organisation, how many workflows are in question, and how much of the groundwork your team has already done.
We spend time with the people who do the work, not only with the people who commission it. Project managers, engineers, estimators, the back office. We want to know where the hours go, which questions get answered over and over, and which handovers cost you rework. In parallel we review the systems you already run, because what is realistic depends heavily on what your data looks like and where it sits.
Every candidate use case gets written down the same way: who or what it serves, the task it performs, the data it needs, and the constraints it works under. We then rank the list by business value, implementation effort, and risk, and put a business case behind the top entries. This is the part most companies skip, and it is why their pilots stall.
We come back with a position, not a menu. Which use case goes first and why, what the architecture behind it should be, which parts you should buy and which you should own, what the regulatory work is, and a sequence for the twelve months after that. Where it helps, we build a working prototype so the decision is made against something real rather than a slide.
Advice that ends at the recommendation is easy to give and hard to act on. We stay available while the first project is delivered, whether your own team builds it, a supplier does, or we do. Plans meet reality quickly, and someone has to make the call when they do.
Client experience
"We came in with a vague idea that AI could help us somewhere. We left with five concrete use cases and an agent that was already answering technical questions from our project documentation."
We are not a strategy house that hands over a deck and leaves. We build AI and software for construction companies for a living, which means our recommendations carry an implementation cost we have actually paid. When we say a use case is harder than it looks, it is because we have built that one before.
Tell us how your teams work today and which processes cost you the most. We will come back with an honest read on what is worth doing and what is not.